Panorama looking eastwards, of the Don River. The photograph is taken from "Hill 190", showing the village of Borshevo on the left of the photograph. This point is about five kilometres south of Kostenki, with Kostenki upstream to the left of the hill in the panorama. The point from which it was taken may be seen on the google earth image above and on the roadmap further down this page, at the point where "190" is printed below the main Borshevo village area. This west bank (true right) of the Don Valley is composed of Cretaceous marl and sand that unconformably overlie Devonian clay.
The bridge to the right of the photo is not yet in service, and will be one of the few ways of getting across the Don River in this area.
Photo: Vladimir Gorodnjanski, 2006 and Google Earth
This is an imaginary cross section through the various Kostenki - Borshevo sites to illustrate the typical positions of the sites in relation to the topography and geology.
- low and high flood-lands; alluvial - dealluvial (?colluvial?) sediments on the valley wall
- the first terrace above the flood plain
- the second terrace above the flood plain
- the third terrace above the flood plain, on the right bank of the Don River
- the third terrace above the flood plain, on the left bank of the Don River, blocked (?) wind blown sand
- frozen subsidence saucers and hollows
- the fourth terrace (alluvial and fluvioglacial sediments)
- glacial edge of the Don (moraine)
- sediment base before quaternary sediments
- modern eroded gullies
- hillside adjournment (?)
- wind deposits
- late palaeolithic deposits
- volcanic ash deposits
Photo: Archaeology of the USSR - The Palaeolithic of the USSR.
My thanks to Vladimir Gorodnjanski for access to this resource.
Comparative stratigraphy of the Kostenki - Borshevo area.
Photo: Man and Culture in the Late Pleistocene, by Richard G. Klein, 1969
Stratigraphic profile of Kostenki 12 (east wall) showing the position of the humic beds, CI tephra horizon, Laschamps excursion, and Upper Paleolithic cultural layers, as well as OSL dates and calibrated radiocarbon dates on charcoal.
At Kostenki 12, sediment below the level of the
ash horizon yielded optically stimulated luminescence
(OSL) dates of between 52,440 ±
3850 and 45 200 ± 3260 years.
Paleomagnetic measurements show that this
sediment contains the Laschamps excursion,
which has been dated elsewhere to 45 000 to
39 000 years ago (21, 22).
View to the northeast from the uplands immediately west of (and above) K12 looking across
the mouth of Pokrovskii Ravine and the village of Kostenki illustrating the setting of K1 at the mouth
(and to the left) of a side ravine (see Figure 3). Kostenki 1 is not on the second terrace proper, which is
considerably higher in elevation. Note position of K13 on the second terrace for comparison of elevations.
The floodplain and channel of the Don River is visible in the upper-right distance.
Photo and Text:
Geoarchaeology of the Kostenki– Borshchevo Sites, Don River Valley, Russia.
Vance T. Holliday et al.
Geoarchaeology: An International Journal, Vol. 22, No. 2, 181–228 (2007)
My thanks to Dr Vance Holliday, Professor of Anthropology & Geosciences, University of Arizona, for access to this resource.
From Wikipedia:
A geomagnetic excursion, like a geomagnetic reversal, is a significant change in the Earth's magnetic field. Unlike reversals however, an excursion does not change the large scale orientation of the field, but rather represents a dramatic, typically short-lived decrease in field intensity. These events, which typically last a few thousand to a few tens of thousands of years, often involve declines in field strength to between 0-20% of normal.
At least two types of assemblages are found
below the CI tephra. At Kostenki 14, the
lowermost occupation level (Layer IVb) contains
prismatic blade cores, bladelets, end-scrapers,
burins, pièces ésquillées, and small bifaces.
Nonstone artifacts include bone points, antler
mattocks, worked ivory, and perforated shell
ornaments. One carved piece of ivory
appears to represent the head of an (unfinished)
human figurine. At Kostenki 17,
Layer II yielded large prismatic blades, numerous
burins, end-scrapers, and some pièces ésquillées.
Ornaments of stone were perforated with a hand-operated
rotary drill. Nonstone items include
bone points and awls and some worked ivory.
These assemblages are associated with large numbers
of small and medium mammal remains—
especially hare (Lepus tanaiticus), arctic fox
(Alopex lagopus), and wolf (Canis lupus)—and
some bird remains. The bones and teeth of large
mammals, including horse (Equus latipes) and reindeer (Rangifer tarandus), are present but
less common.
(Note in particular the cultural layers III and IV below the volcanic ash of the CI Tephra - Don)
Photo and text:
Early Upper Paleolithic in Eastern Europe and Implications for the Dispersal of Modern Humans
M. V. Anikovich, et al.
Science 315, 223 (2007)
My thanks to Dr Vance Holliday, Professor of Anthropology & Geosciences, University of Arizona, for access to this resource.
Detailed map showing locations of the Kostenki 2, 10, 11 and 20 sites.
Source: Boguchar Museum
Photo: Vladimir Gorodnjanski
"Soil" profile for Kostenki 11
Source: Boguchar Museum
Photo: Vladimir Gorodnjanski
Kostenki is at 51° 23'N, 39° 03' E. This puts it near the town of Novovoronezh, about 40 km (25 miles) south of Voronezh, on the western side (right bank) of the Don River.
Borshevo is at 51° 20' 48" N, 39° 07' E.
Map of location of Kostenki
Photo: http://uk8.multimap.com
Road Map of the Kostenki - Borshevo area
Photo: adapted from an unknown source
It is important to place Kostenki in relation to other cultures with similar characteristics in the same general region. This has been done by Victor P. Chabai in his paper entitled "The chronological and industrial variability of the Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition in eastern Europe" which may be found at www.ipa.min-cultura.pt/pubs/TA/folder/33/070-087.pdf
He identifies four cultures in the Kostenki assemblage, as shown in the map above:
- The Streletskaya Culture/Eastern Szeletian at Kostenki 1/V and at Kostenki 12/III with dates ranging from 36 000 to 27 000 BP
- The Spitsynskaya culture at Kostenki 17/II with dates ranging from 36 000 to 32 000 BP
- The Gorodtsovskaya culture at Kostenki 14/II and Kostenki 15 with dates ranging from 32 000 to 27 000 BP
- The Aurignacian culture at Kostenki 1/III with dates centering around 25 000 BP
Table of dates below from:
The Early Upper Paleolithic beyond Western Europe (2004)
P. Jeffrey Brantingham, Steven L. Kuhn, Kristopher W. Kerry
| Age | Stage |
West and Southwest | South | Central | Northeast |
| 24 000 BP | |
| Biryuchia Balka 2/III | Khotylevo | |
| |
| Korpatch IV | | Sungir | |
| |
Late/early | Koulichivka II | | Rusanikha | |
| 26 000 BP |
| Brynzeny III | | | |
| |
Upper | Korman 4/VII | Kostenki 17/I | | |
| |
| Molodova 5/VIII | Kostenki 16 | | |
| 28 000 BP | Palaeolithic |
| Kostenki 8/II | | |
| |
| Ivanychi | Kostenki 1/III | | Garchi 1 |
| |
| Zhornov IIa | | | Byzovaya |
| 30 000 BP | |
| | | |
| | |
Molodova 5/IX-X | Kostenki 15 | | |
| | |
| Kostenki 14/II | | |
| 32 000 BP | |
| | | |
| | |
Mira II | | | |
| | |
Kulychivka III | Biryuchia Balka Iv/VII | | Zaozerie |
| | Initial |
| | | |
| | |
| | | |
| 36 000 BP | Upper |
| Kostenki 1/V | | |
| | |
Korman 4/X | Kostenki 12/II | | |
| | Palaeolithic | Molodova 5/Xa, Xb | Kostenki 17/II | | |
| 38 000 BP | | |
Kostenki 12/III | | |
| | | |
Kostenki 14/IVb | | |
| 40 000 BP | | |
| | |
Sites with no absolute dates are shown in italics.
The dates above need to be seen in relation to recent recalibration of the Campanian volcanic ash deposits, under which the oldest of the Kostenki deposits are laid.
Note results such as the following:
From Pyle et al: http://gsa.confex.com/gsa/inqu/finalprogram/abstract_55609.htm
The ca. 39 000 to 41 000 yr BP eruption of the Campanian Ignimbrite from the Phlegrean Fields, Central Italy, left a widespread tephra marker (known as the Campanian Ignimbrite Y5 ash, or CI Y5) that has been recognised in marine sediment cores across the Eastern Mediterranean. Recent work in the north-eastern Aegean and in south-western Russia confirms that a considerable portion of the Y5 ash was dispersed towards the North and East during this eruption, with fine-grained tephra deposited more than 2500 km from the known source region. In the Don River region of south-west Russia, deposits that are correlated with Y5 on the basis of detailed chemical analysis are found both in well-characterised archaeological contexts (the Paleolithic sites of Kostenki-Borschevo), and in undisturbed geological contexts nearby. The extent of dispersal of ash during the Campanian Ignimbrite eruption confirms this event as the largest known volcanic eruption in Europe of the past 100 000 years.
And this one, a version of which may be found at: http://www.archeo.ru/rus/projects/kostenki14.htm
Unusual antiquity of the bottom cultural layers of a monument
Project head: Sinitsyn Andrey Aleksandrovich, Professor of historical sciences.
Vladimir Gorodnjanskiodnjanski, 2004
e-mail: admin@archeo.ru
Radiocarbon date 37 240 ± 430/400 for IVb, (not the lowermost) a cultural layer, for the present moment is the most ancient authentic date of the top paleolithic
The excavations undertaken by the Kostenki expedition from the Russian Academy of Science on the mountain Markinoj (Kostenki 14) during 1998-2000, have led to opening a previously unknown layer of the most ancient upper palaeolithic monuments of the East Europe, and to the unexpected discovery for this time of human archeological materials
The age of at least three cultural layers is defined by their position under a horizon of volcanic ashes whose formation results from one of the eruptions of the volcanic system Flegrejskih of fields in Italy (the Campanian Ignimbrite from the Phlegrean Fields, Central Italy), dated 35 000 years BC. Radiocarbon and IRSL dates for these cultural layers within the limits of 34 - 44 thousand years BC and the palynological analysis does not contradict the geological age of the site.
- On mountain Markinoj (Kostenki 14, also known as Markina Gora) we deal with a unique situation of great value.
- presence of a series of cultural layers lying in precise stratigraphic conditions;
- two of them represent the remains of complexly structured settlements, in Eastern Europe.
- One of the IRSL dates for the bottom cultural layer designated as " horizon of the hearths " gives an age of 44.9 ± 3.8 thousand years, that is according to the paleological data analysis, testifying to an early Vjurmskij age for the geological horizon containing this cultural layer;
-
Unusual character of material culture of the most ancient cultural layers, first of all, the bone industry having (on modern representations) a very "developed" shape. The ornamental core from the IVб (IV b) cultural layer is an example of the most ancient art of Eastern European ornamental art in general;
-
Found in the horizon of volcanic ashes in 2000 the cultural layer represents a unique phenomenon, being the remains of a settlement whose existence has been interrupted by a catastrophic event comparable to the cataclysm which destroyed Pompeii, Herculaneum and Stabij 35 000 years later. Ornamental strung objects and shells with artificial apertures from this layer are the most ancient ornaments known from Eastern Europe; (the perforated shells (Columbellidae) in the lowermost level at Kostenki 14 apparently are derived from a source no closer than the Black Sea i.e., transported >500 km) (Science 12 January 2007: Early Upper Paleolithic in Eastern Europe and Implications for the Dispersal of Modern Humans by M. V. Anikovich, A. A. Sinitsyn et al)
-
In aggregate these data not only change traditional representations about the upper paleolithic of the East Europe, and the character of evolution and the mechanism of formation of a cultural originality, but change the problematics of the top paleolithic as a whole, raising some questions, which had not arisen earlier. In this result consists the principal value of the research.
-
Layer IVa and "the horizon of the hearths" represent extremely seldom met types of settlements: the first, contacts result single-sweep rotational hunting; the second, in general earlier the unknown person, presumably (by results of the excavation enough limited on the area 1999), has a number of the attributes, allowing to establish its communication with fishery and accompanying (down to weaving nets) kinds of activity.
The Archaeological Site of Kostenki
Kostenki 14 (Markina Gora) at the approximate level of the discovery of the human (at horizon III) whose bust has been created by Professor M.M.Gerasimov, shown right. This is the skull with alleged Negroid or east african features.
- There was only one find at this horizon, a male aged 20 - 25 years.
- Skull and postcranial skeleton both well preserved.
- All permanent teeth in place and slightly worn. Third molars less worn than others.
- All cranial sutures open.
- Length of right femur 427 mm.
- Height of individual estimated to have been 160 cm.
Photos: (left) http://www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0211/008a/02111056.htm
(right) Vladimir Gorodnjanski
Text: Richard G. Klein, Man and Culture in the Late Pleistocene.
Well known archaeologist Andrey Alekseevich Velichko gives a lecture on the actual site of Kostenki 14.
The holes in the walls of the excavation have been made to take samples for analysis.
Photos: http://www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0211/008a/02111056.htm
There is a lot of hard work, with little result, when working on an archaeological site. But there is a lot of good feeling generated by being with others in such a situation.
Kostenki 14
Photo: http://www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0211/008a/02111056.htm
Photo from the dig at Kostenki 14, 2004.
Photo: http://www.trinitas.ru/rus/doc/0211/008a/02111056.htm
Excavations at Kostenki 14 in 2003 (looking at the north wall of the excavations and stratigraphic profile).
The archaeological site of Kostenki is a actually a stratified series of sites deeply buried within the alluvial deposits of a steep ravine that empties into the Don River in central Russia. The Kostenki site has been known for quite a while (it is best known for the recovery of Venus figurines from its Gravettian levels), and its uniqueness has not gone unnoticed.
The occupations at Kostenki include several Late Early Upper Paleolithic levels, dated ca 40 000 to 30 000 calibrated years ago. Below these levels is a layer of volcanic ash, associated with the volcanic eruptions of the Phlegrean Fields of Italy (aka Campanian Ignimbrite), which are thought to have erupted between about 38 000 and 40 000 years ago. Within and below the ash level (called the CI Tephra) is what archaeologists are calling "Aurignacian Dufour," containing numerous small bladelets and related to similar sites in western Europe.
Typically, the Aurignacian is the oldest component associated with modern humans at archaeological sites in Europe, underlain by Mousterian-like deposits representing Neanderthals. At Kostenki, a previously unidentified assemblage, exhibiting a sophisticated tool kit of prismatic blades, burins, bone antler, and ivory artifacts, and small perforated shell ornaments underlies the CI Tephra and Aurignacian Dufour assemblage. That the location includes
the use of traps to catch small mammals such as hares, reinforces the view that stone age humans used technology and innovation to expand into new areas.
Photo and text: http://archaeology.about.com/od/earlymansites/a/kostenki.htm
Science © 2007
New Dates at Kostenki
Non-stone artifacts from the lowest layer at Kostenki that includes a perforated shell, a probable small human figurine (three views, top center) and several assorted awls, mattocks and bone points dating to greater than 40 000 years ago
The CI Y5 Tephra was recently dated in the eastern Mediterranean using the potassium-argon dating method to 39 300 years ago; and optically stimulated luminescence dating of the layers below it at Kostenki indicates that they are several thousand years older than the tephra. The new non-Aurignacian assemblage is unarguably sophisticated, particularly in comparison with the local Mousterian, including large prismatic blades, numerous burins, end scrapers and pieces esquillees.
Photo and text: http://archaeology.about.com/od/earlymansites/a/kostenki.htm
Colorado University at Boulder © 2007
Shell, fossil, and bone ornaments were made with a hand-held rotary drill. Perforated shells originating in the Black Sea region were discovered; and a piece of carved ivory may represent an unfinished human figurine. Finally, bones of small animals (hare, arctic fox, wolf, and bird) suggests the inhabitants used fairly sophisticated hunting methods.
Text: http://archaeology.about.com/od/earlymansites/a/kostenki.htm
Photo:
Early Upper Paleolithic in Eastern Europe and Implications for the Dispersal of Modern Humans
M. V. Anikovich, et al.
Science 315, 223 (2007)
My thanks to Dr Vance Holliday, Professor of Anthropology & Geosciences, University of Arizona, for access to this resource.
Humans or Neanderthals?
Kostenki 14 excavations in 2002.
No skeletal remains have been found to date in these levels at Kostenki, except for isolated teeth, which appear to be modern human. Modern humans are identified as the occupants of these levels primarily on the basis of the artifacts, which include forms completely unknown in neandertal sites.
At the moment, the assemblages in the lowest levels at Kostenki do not have a parallel - they are generically Upper Paleolithic but without close analogue - and researchers are convinced that Kostenki does in fact represent one of the earliest outposts by early modern humans outside of Africa.
Text above from: http://archaeology.about.com/od/earlymansites/a/kostenki.htm
Photo: http://elementy.ru/news/430435
Art of the Gorocovskaya cultures
Artefacts recovered from Kostenki 14 level II. They consist of what look like bone or mammoth ivory zoomorphic forms, hoes, spades, handles and possibly a digging stick.
Photo: "The Upper Paleolithic of the Russian plain and the Crimean Peninsula"
My thanks to Vladimir Gorodnjanski for access to this resource.
From: N.D. Praslov et al, 'The Steppes in the Late Palaeolithic'
Although a location close to a source of drinking water seems to have been a desideratum in each case, the strategy for positioning the settlement site seems to have been different. Mammoth hunters arranged their permanent settlements in low areas of dissected relief on the first and second terraces within river valleys, near brooks and ravines, e.g. Kostenki, Mezin; on the other hand specialist bison-hunters and the hunters of other gregarious animals preferred to settle in elevated areas with a good view, shown by the plateau sites of Amvrosievka, Zolotovka and Anetovka.
Late Palaeolithic sites excavated over the past decades provide good examples of cultural adaptations both in terms of general traits and in detail. Mammoth-hunters often used large mammoth bones for building purposes. There were many cases when mammoth long bones were used to stabilize the bases of dwellings (see photo below) in contact with the earth, in preference to wood which rots quickly (particularly in conditions of variable humidity). Cleaved transversally and dug into the ground, sometimes fixed in place with chips of bones or stones, they served as sockets into which wooden poles were inserted, at Kostenki 4, Kostenki 19, etc.
(Note: this is a method of ensuring that wooden poles for houses or other structures have a much longer life. Normally wood rots quickly in moist ground. The builders cut across the mammoth bones, which exposed the hollow centre of the bone. The bone was then dug into the ground and locked into position with rammed stones and bone chips around it, but the pole was inserted into the hollow centre of the bone, above ground level. It was thus not exposed to the fungi and wood rotting organisms such as insects and other invertebrates which otherwise destroy organic material such as wood in a few years. A similar method is used today to preserve vertical wooden supports for such things as carports, but steel stirrups are used to raise the wooden posts above the (usually concreted) ground level. - Don)
Tusks were used in the construction of roofs above subterranean dwellings at Kostenki I. Understandably, no such examples are found in the southern zone, as there are no mammoth remains in that area and bones of bison or horses are unsuited for such purposes.
Excavation of mammoth long bones at Kostenki I
Photo: N.D. Praslov
The structure of settlements and the 'regular' planning of dwellings in view of the relief shows how well adapted Late Palaeolithic hunters were. For instance, at Kostenki 4 long dwellings were arranged on a slope in such a position as to allow for water run-off along the long walls during the snow melt.
Of particular interest are the stone pavements found at sites of totally different cultures, situated in different landscape zones far from one another. Kostenki 21 is situated in the area of the Middle Don, whereas Muralovka lies on the right bank of the Mius liman (a brackish salt-water lagoon) not far from Taganrog. Both these settlements were situated near water sources, Kostenki 21 near a brook mouth, Muralovka on a bank of a liman.
Mammoth bone dwellings at Kostenki II
Photo: N.D. Praslov
Mammoth bone dwellings at Kostenki II, inside the 'pavilion' which was at one time in disrepair.
Photo: http://uic.rsu.ru/Don_NC/Ancient/Stone/kostenki.htm
Text below adapted from the John Hawks Weblog at:
http://johnhawks.net/weblog/reviews/archaeology/upper/vishnyatsky_2004_kostenki.html
Note that Kostenki is not a single "site": instead there are an array of open-air sites within the Kostenki district, all of which are stratified into the terraces of the Don River. Distinct localities are labeled with an Arabic number and the "cultural layer" is given a Roman numeral, e.g., "Kostenki 12/III." These localities comprise a majority of the initial Upper Paleolithic sites on the Russian Plain, and the archaeological and the earliest occupation stages had been dated to between 39 000 and 34 000 years ago.
This photograph shows that the 'pavilion' that was in disrepair at Kostenki 11 is now very much restored, which is wonderful news. It is possible that this is a recreation of the original dig.
Photo: Vladimir Gorodnjanski, 2006
It is also very good to see that the pavilion is being used for education purposes. These students will come away with a better understanding of their culture and heritage.
Photo: Vladimir Gorodnjanski, 2006

The Kostenki sites are close not only to the Don River, which provided a "highway" for migrating mammoths, but to smaller streams and springs which almost always provided clear drinking water, not muddied by floods or glacier runoff clouded by ground rock.
This pontoon bridge provides valuable access from one side of the Don to the other. The gears visible on the right are used to tension the wire rope which helps to keep the pontoons lined up correctly.
Photo: Vladimir Gorodnjanski, 2006

Elsewhere, car ferries are used. This one has a recycled tractor to act as the motive power, pulling on a wire rope stretched from one side of the Don River to the other.
Photo: Vladimir Gorodnjanski, 2006
Ongoing excavations in Russia indicate anatomically modern humans were developing new technologies for survival in the cold, harsh region some 30 000 to 40 000 years ago, according to a University of Colorado at Boulder researcher...excavations at Kostenki -- a series of more than 20 sites about 250 miles south of present-day Moscow -- have yielded bone and ivory needles with eyelets that are 30 000 years old.
A similar situation was observed at Muralovka. The dwelling was situated on a small cape on a bank of a liman. Quite near its western side ground water ran from below loamy clay along the surface of Sarmatian limestone. To keep out the constant moisture, a narrow band along the north-western part of the dwelling was paved with limestone slabs.
Hunting flourished during the so-called middle part of the Upper Palaeolithic. In my opinion, this was promoted considerably by the improvement of hunting implements, particularly the ability to launch projectiles over a longer range after the bow was invented and brought into use between 30 000 and 25 000 b.p.
Photo and text: http://www.marsearthconnection.com/news.html
(Google cache, no longer there. Photo probably summer 2001)
Plan and Cross section of a round, sunken hut at Kostienki.
Photo: K. Sklenar, 'Hunters of the Stone Age'

From scattered mammoth bones excavators at Kostenki along the Don River south of Voronezh in Russia reconstruct the appearance of shelters built some 23 000 years ago. A wealth of ornaments, tools, and animal remains point to a complex life style and plentiful game exploited by hunters who had adapted to the cold of windswept steppes and were not constantly on the move seeking food.
From: National Geographic October 1988, photo by Ira Block

Reconstruction of a house at Kostenki which does not use mammoth bones as a primary structural material.
Photo: From the book shown, by Vinnikov.
My thanks to Vladimir Gorodnjanski for access to this resource.
The text below is from pages 51 and 52 of the above book, by Vinnikov, and kindly translated for me by Vladimir Gorodnjanski:
There are now convincing proofs that paleolithic people used gathering or collecting as an auxiliary means of livelihood. They prepared berries, grains of wild cereals, young wild plants, dug up edible roots, and even supplemented the diet with fresh-water molluscs.
Found at the sites are many stone implements used for cutting up and grinding of vegetable food. They are found especially at Kostenki 1.
At the very end of the paleolithic people increasingly began using fishing even though they did not yet use hooks or nets.
Catching of a fish was conducted by the most elementary ways during the periods spawning when fish, becoming careless, gathered in shallow water, where they could be speared or harpooned.
Fish bones have been found at Kostenki 8.
Despite the increasing importance of collecting, hunting at this time was still the basis of the economy of palaeolithic communities, it defined their development, social system and spiritual life.
Only on the Don River are so many different types of buildings represented.
At Kostenki 1, huge dwellings up to 31 metres long and 8 metres wide, with many hearths and with many dug pantries were found, and at Kostenki 4 the top layer had a long dwelling with a living area of 187 square metres.
As well as these longitudinal plan dwellings, there were a number of round dwellings (constructed of bone and earth) as well, especially at Kostenki 2 and 11.
On a number of other sites, the dwellings were of an elementary type resembling tepees or wigwams, but surprisingly for such portable dwellings, there was a great accumulation at these sites of cultural artefacts, as though they were used for long periods of time in this one place.
On the bottom cultural layer of Kostenki 4 are found round dwellings with a diameter of 6 metres, slightly dug into the ground, with one fireplace in the centre and with an extension providing a type of inner porch.
In the construction of these larger semi subterranean dwellings, mammoth bones were widely used, and preference was given to tusks, skulls and shoulders of the animals. They were driven into the ground or stacked like a woodpile to provide the basis for the walls of the dwellings. As well, skins, wood and earth were used for building.
It is difficult to imagine in such a remote northern area, but the people of Kostenki had a gregarious way of life, where severe conditions demanded adaptation to the environment, sustained by hunting for animals which themselves were gregarious.
Cooperation was needed for both huntin these large animals, and in building these large shelters. It predetermined a settled way of life for human societies. Collecting was limited by the foods available withing a limited territory, and a division of labour was probably necessary, possibly based on age and sex, as well as the size of the particular group. Adult men were probably engaged in hunting, the manufacture of stone and bone implements, and the construction of dwellings as well as the processing of large animals, those occupations which demanded greater physical strength.
A sunken floored hut from Kostienki I. A fireplace is shaded on the floor, covered by mammoth tusks, which probably supported the roof.
Photo: K. Sklenar, 'Hunters of the Stone Age'
Plan de la première structure d'habitat de Kostienki I, couche 1,
d'après P. P. Efimenko. Reconstitution spatiale des représentations animalières d'après L. Iakovleva.
Plan of the first hut of Kostienki I, layer 1, according to P. P. Efimenko. Plan of the representation of animal remains according to L Iakovleva.
Photo and French text: "les mammouths - Dossiers
Archéologie - n° 291 - Mars 2004"
My thanks to Anya for access to this resource.
Note also the plan of the same Horizon I house, Kostienki I below after Klein, R.G. 1973.

Plan of Horizon I house, Kostienki I after Klein, R.G. 1973. Ice-Age Hunters of the Ukraine. Univ. of Chicago.
Note the alternative plan above, showing animal remains, from the source "les mammouths - Dossiers
Archéologie - n° 291 - Mars 2004".
The text below is from the very useful book 'The Prehistory of Europe' 1980 by Patricia Phillips (Allen Lane)
This structure described by Klein comes from the loess-like loams overlying the upper humic bed in the Kostienki-Borshevo terraces. Kostienki 1, Horizon 1, was excavated in the 1930s, and reconstructed as a 'long house' 35 in long by approximately 16 m wide. This colossal area encompassed nine hearth pits, mostly down the centre line of the structure, and sixteen large pits around the periphery, four of them interpreted as sleeping areas and twelve as caches, full of mammoth bone.
The rest of the floor of the supposed structure was covered with a series of little pits, again regarded as caches. Klein is not convinced by the interpretation of the structure as a single long house (iq69b, p. 121). The agglomeration of features is certainly of great interest, however, as is also the presence of a series of animal figurines, and bone artifacts including possible 'head' bands with incised decoration. Six female figurines from the site were made of local limestone (marl) and ivory (Klein, 1969b) (Fig. 29). Many fragmentary remains of figurines were also found. The figurines are decorated with bands incised around the waist and above the breast. Larger bone artifacts include possible mattocks. The famous Kostienki points, which are elongated flint points with an asymmetrically placed tang, have been examined by Semenov for evidence of microwear (1964). He has concluded that they were used as knives.
Another Kostienki site, No. IV, Horizon 1, consisted of two depressions 6 m apart and approximately 6 in in diameter, considered to represent hut floors. The original huts may have been larger as the finds distribution is wider than that of the actual depressions and extends particularly to the south-west where, it is suggested, the doorway was. The excavators believe that points with burin facets on the proximal end may have been used as whittle knives, with the burin end inserted into a handle. Other interesting finds from this site include ground slate discs 3 to 6 cm in diameter which, it is suggested, were used to retouch the flints. In addition there were dotdecorated stylized figurines in ivory, and ivory rods and bone 'clothes fasteners'. Bones from Horizons I and 11 at Kostienki IV were not separated during excavation, but it is assumed that woolly rhinoceros and cave lion at least derived from Horizon 1. As with the other Ukrainian sites previously mentioned, pits occurred in the Kostienki IV-I habitation units, the western hut containing eight pits in the centre, all under a layer of heavy grey ash. In the eastern depression, there were six ash-filled pits and others which seemed to have served as caches. Sandstone slabs around the periphery may have had something to do with the original wall structure, and two cave lion crania found on the top of the deposit are suggested to have been used to crown the original tents. Klein has suggested that from the calories available in the form of animals the different sites in the Kostienki-Borshevo region could have been occupied from as long as forty-three days to four years. He suggests that the sites represent longish occupation, probably during the winter.
East European archaeologists are particularly interested in the origin of raw materials used in Palaeolithic sites, and in the wear marks visible on the retouched tools; for instance, at the Kostienki sites, brown and yellow flint and quartzite are of local origin, but the black flint brought in as blanks is not. Petrographic analysis has proved that some of the black flint comes from approximately 150 km to the south-west, from the valleys of the Valuj and the Oskol rivers. Other black flint may come from as far as 300 km away.

The text below is from the very useful book 'The Prehistory of Europe' 1980 by Patricia Phillips (Allen Lane)
Kozlowski has recently discussed flint mines in southern Poland, one near Cracow, one near Czestochowa, and one near Radom. The latter source produces magnificent chocolate-coloured flint. All these sites have deep extraction shafts and shallower pits. In the Polish Late Palaeolithic (Swiderian) the flint extracted was initially worked near by, e.g. at the site of GoJac. Then pre-cores, initial cores and blank blades were exported. There is a vast distribution of chocolate flint, presumably coming from the Radom mines, along the River Vistula. Away from the source sites there is a greater concentration of artifacts and less flintworking debris than in the workshops near the mines. Kozlowski has studied the distribution of flint types in eastern Europe (as in the accompanying diagram) In the western part of Poland, Czechoslovakia and Hungary, Upper Palaeolithic peoples used a majority of Upper Silesian flint (76-87 per cent in Moravia), with some radiolarite coming from the Carpathians or the Alps in second place. In eastern Slovakia and east Hungary, the dominant material used was the local obsidian and in the Dneister and Punt valleys local Cretaceous flint. Kozlowski has suggested intergroup ownership of source areas, or early barter, as an explanation for distribution patterns of flint and other materials. He suggests that these trade routes began in the Paudorf interstadial, i.e. from approximately 30 000 years B.P. One route led from the Danube to the Morava to the Oder, and another from the Dniester to the east Carpathian passes, and thence to the Carpathian basins.
A sunken floored hut from Kostienki I. A fireplace is shaded on the floor, covered by mammoth tusks, which probably supported the roof.
Photo: K. Sklenar, 'Hunters of the Stone Age'
This is a plan of an unusual fireplace at Kostienki. The hearth is surrounded by pits which were used for baking meat in hot ashes. The fireplace is indicated with hatching, the pits with dense dots and the ashes with more open dots.
Photo: K. Sklenar, 'Hunters of the Stone Age'

From Cave Men's Buildings
by V. Gordon Childe
Antiquity (Journal) 24:7 (pp4 - 9)
Plan of Kostienki IV
The excavated areas are divided up into one-metre squares ; the irregular lines mark the limits of the two excavated ' houses ' ; the broken lines, low ridges dividing the excavated area into 'rooms', numbered I to VI; the black spots mark hearths.
(after Rogachev)

Another view of Kostienki IV from People of the Earth by Brian Fagan
the quote below is from:
"The Russian Dig" by: Andrea Elyse Messer (Research/Penn State, Vol. 17, no. 1 (March, 1996))
The landscape was amazing. Miles of gently rolling fields filled with wild flowers and herbs. As we walked, the smell of dill, mint, and marjoram was strong. At the terminal moraine, the furthest reach of the glaciers, the ground stretched out a series of very thin fingers above a drop of hundreds of feet. The archaeologists keep a small section of the edge of one finger clear of vegetation so that, standing across on another finger, we could see the sediment layers clearly: The 28 000-year-old layer, from which we would be excavating human artifacts and evidence of habitations (Americans can claim human occupation only back to 12,000 or perhaps 14,000 years ago). And two other layers beneath, the earliest dating to about 35,000 before present.
the quote below is from:
http://www.zin.ru/annrep/2000/14.html
As a result of archaeological excavations in Late Palaeolithic sites in Kostenki village in Voronezhskaya Oblast vast paleontological material has been accumulated comprising more than 50 000 bones of different mammal species of which more than 10 000 belong to the mammoth. Fossil bones collected were characterized by poor state of preservation, and therefore only 497 specimens were used for measurements during the period from 1977 through 1989. .............
Length of numerous tusks in Kostenki in Voronezhskaya Oblast varied from 18 cm to 3 m. Female tusks were 40-95 mm in diameter, on the average 81.3 mm (n=22). Their circumference varied from 130 to 300 mm, on the average 235.73 mm. Tusks ascribed to males were 97-195 mm in diameter on the average 140.2 mm (n=48) with circumference of 310-615 mm on the average 440.22 mm.
the quote below is from:
http://www.alekseevmanuscript.com/ChapterIV.html
Kostenki is located in the Don River Basin near the Sea of Azov. It is a small village surrounded by hills and dry valleys, ideal for hunting. At the site of Kostenki, both stone and bone tools have been found as well as stone and bone sculptures. Alexander Marshack interprets decorations found on bone pieces as astrological calculations. Bone female figurines also have been found; these are similar to those found in Willendorf, Austria and are examples of Kostenki art. Here at Kostenki there is also evidence of houses.
Both Kostenki II and Kostenki XIV produced burials of Upper Paleolithic man. Skeletal remains from Kostenki II are of an adult male, tall, and approximately fifty years of age. Reconstruction of the head reveals a broad face and narrow brow. The head from Kostenki XIV is the best preserved; no bones were destroyed except for the end of the nasal bone which had been crushed by the investigator. Reconstruction reflects a very strong adult individual with a combination of morphological features. The nose is very broad, similar to African or Australian. This strong development around the nose is not typical for Europoid but is similar to East African populations; however, Negroid nasal bones are flat while Kostenki XIV is strong. This find is a combination of features whose origin is different from other groups.
Thus, at Kostenki, we have both stone and bone tools and sculptures as well as houses, female figurines similar the "Venus of Willendorf", and the remains of Upper Paleolithic man. From Kostenki II we have a broad head and narrow brow and from Kostenki XIV we have a tall adult exhibiting a combination of strong physical features which differ from typical Europoid.
The quotes below are from: The Pictorial Encyclopedia of The Evolution of Man
J. Jelinek
PP236 - 247
Discoveries from the Ukraine and south Siberia
Discoveries of Stone Age settlements in the Ukraine and south Siberia have yielded much information. Both areas belong to the loess regions which bear so many Palaeolithic remains. The dwellings can be divided into two groups. There are round dwellings with a diameter of about 5 to 6 metres, and there are dwellings which are very large and are thought to have been inhabited by whole tribes. These dwellings usually have many fireplaces running down the middle. Today, ideas have changed and it is not clear whether the settlement was made up of separate dwellings with the fireplaces in the middle, or whether they represent a single construction.
The oldest Ukrainian dwelling was excavated during 1955 to 1961 and 1963 in Molodova on the banks of the river Dniester, USSR. Large mammoth bones from the Mousterian layer were found lying in a circle. The circle was 6 to 8 metres in diameter and consisted of twelve skulls, fifteen tusks, thirty-four hip and shoulder blade bones, five lower jaws, and fifty-one mammoth long-bones. The circle was broken in two diametrically opposed places, which must have been the entrances. Inside the dwelling fifteen small fireplaces were found, their size varying from 0.4 by 1.0 metres and 0.3 by 0.4 metres. They contained burned bones and charcoal and this latter proved that the inhabitants had used wood to make their fires.
There is not much evidence of what this dwelling looked like inside. It is probable that the basic structure was made of wood and was covered with animal skins which were held down at the edges by bones. The large mammoth bones were obviously part of the building material. This type of construction is also found in Upper Palaeolithic settlements in the Ukraine, and seems proof that man was already able to build large dwellings in the Middle Palaeolithic and that he was no longer dependent on caves. The remains of the dwelling found at Molodova, however, could not nave been arrived at without many years of prior development because such a dwelling cannot be called primitive any more.
The site of Telmanskaya at Kostienki (Ukraine) was discovered by P P Yefimenko and A N Rogatchev in 1937. In the upper cultural layer a round hut-pit with a diameter of 5.2 to 5.6 metres and 500 to 700 millimetres deep was found. The walls were upright and the bottom flat. A 2 metre wide passage led out of the hut in a westerly direction. The only bowl-shaped fireplace lay right in the centre of' the hut. It measured 750 to 800 millimetres in diameter, was 150 to 200 millimetres deep, and contained ash and burned bones. Opposite the entrance three depressions in the ground were noticed. These were probably used as storage places. Rogatchev continued the research here in 1949 and 1950 and found further pits. If they had all been built simultaneously the dwelling could not have been habitable. It can be assumed that several layers representing continuous periods must have contributed to the positions of the various pits and holes. This settlement is similar in size and in the shape of the small pits to the settlement of Alexandrovka which lies only a little further away.
Rogatchev discovered second, third, and fourth occupation layers. The second layer revealed a complete settlement and part of a round dwelling six to seven metres in diameter which stood out as being different from the surroundings by kind and number of tools. Several quartz flakes were found here, but hardly, any mammoth tusks, bones, and bone flakes, although these were found in abundance outside the hut, while no quartz flakes were found outside at all. A fireplace was in the centre of the round hut, and it contained charcoal and burned bones. It is not a rare occurrence at Kostienki to find more than one occupation level, which must mean that this was a very favourable place, situated as it is along the banks of the river Don on clay ground.
The site of Alexandrovka is known as Kostienki IV and was excavated in 1937 and 1938 by A N Rogatchev. He discovered two kinds of settlement which he later attributed to two different cultures. He uncovered two round huts in the upper layer which were overlapping on one side with huts of the lower layer, and which presented a number of fireplaces. A loess deposit, completely sterile, separated the two layers: this loess deposit was found opposite the two round huts of the upper layer. The lower deposits also showed outlines of round huts and contained large dwellings. Rogatchev felt that the two occupation layers must have intermingled at a later date, as there were different types of dwellings as well as differences in other objects. The upper layer contained several quartz, slate, and mammoth ivory flakes, and typical burins and bifacial stone tools which were all totally absent in the lower layer.
The outlines of the two round huts of the upper layer were only 100 to 400 millimetres deep, and each had a bowl-shaped fireplace in the centre of the floor. Many more implements were discovered inside the hut than outside. On the northern edge of the dwelling situated to the west the thinner cultural layer did not reach far beyond the hollowed-out space of each hut. This did not happen on the southern edge where the two round huts were connected by an ochre-coloured substance. The area was sloping slightly at this particular point, and it can be assumed that the upper deposit had slipped down at a later date.
The hut on the western side was more interesting. It was 400 millimetres deep towards its northern edge but only 100 millimetres on its eastern side. There the floor of the hut was on a level with the ground outside. Six enormous tusks were found inside, the larger part of a humerus bone, a lower jaw, part of a shoulder blade, and parts of the spines and ribs of mammoths At the edge of this deposit twenty large sandstone stabs and pieces of sandstone were found. They lay at the very top of this deposit. and may be considered to be building material.
Particularly interesting was the discovery of a lion's skull, found in the upper levels of the layer. Rogatchev thought that the skull might have been kept on top of the roof as a kind of decoration or that it might have had some ritual significance. Yefimenko made an interesting discovery of the skull of an aurochs in dwelling 'A' at the site of Kostienki 1, which might be a parallel.
The fireplace which was in the centre of the settlement was surrounded by about twenty holes, about 200 millimetres deep. They were probably used to store or prepare food, because pots or similar containers were unknown at this period. The tusks and bones of mammoths in the eastern dwelling were found at the bottom of the layer, not at the top. It can be assumed that they were not part of the construction (with the exception of the two tusks which were found in a somewhat higher level). The fireplace which was almost round, measured I metre in diameter, was approximately 100 millimetres deep, and slightly tilted in a westerly direction. It had a flat base and was bordered by a very small rim, only slightly protruding above the normal surface of the hut, Five medium-sized holes were found nearby, and from their position it would appear that they were of different periods. On the southern edge of the settlement a clay wall in good condition was found, it was 50 to 90 millimetres high and 400 to 500 millimetres wide. The clay was obviously deposited there when the living area was dug out and was then used either to stabilise the huts or to form a retaining border. The flat stones found at the western side must also have been used in the same way.
The lower layer of this site revealed two large, long dwellings. The one on the southern side was 33.5 metres by 5.5 metres and was distinguishable by the reddish colouring of its cultural layer. The other one was situated between 17 and 20 metres further north and measured 5.5 by 2.3 metres. (this length and width appear to be typographical errors) The first dwelling had more than ten (11 fireplaces are shown) centrally placed fireplaces in it and the plan shows that there must have been three different parts which are separated from one another by steps about 100 millimetres high. The first part, to the west, was 14 metres long, the centre part was 9 metres long, and the eastern section was 10.5 metres long, and also contained the richest finds. (28.6 metres by 6 metres according to the plan. This could easily be the description for 371 instead of 370) The dwelling was constructed along the slope obviously to protect its shortest side against the rain and water from melting snow. All fireplaces were built along the longitudinal axis of the dwelling, and it can be assumed that the structure must have had a roof which was highest in the middle.( no mention is made here of the add-on semicircular section) The roof was obviously anchored to the ground and cross-beams were connected to the ridge.
This is also substantiated by the way in which it was found. The middle of the dwelling produced more material probably because all activities were carried out there. On the north end of the western section was a kind of passage which was obviously the only entrance and faced the valley of the Don. Most of the stone and bone flakes were found around the fireplaces which means that meals were prepared here, and tools made. All activities were obviously carried out inside the dwelling. Most of the bones found here belonged to hares; other animals are rarely found. On the north, and south-east side of the dwelling two smaller areas were found; they were not dug out, but were covered with flaked stones and bones. In the warm season people obviously used to sit outside and work.
The outlines of the second dwelling were clearly marked by the tool-finds. This dwelling, too, was divided into three parts and had altogether nine bowl-shaped fireplaces. There were two fireplaces in the western part, four in the central section, and three in the south-eastern part. ( 33.3 metres by 6 metres according to the plan. The division of the fireplaces identifies this as plan 371) Three cooking pits and twenty five smaller holes were found around the fireplaces - they were 200 to 400 millimetres across and of the same depth. There were no holes outside the dwelling. Three upright mammoth flakes of long-bones were found on the western part 600 millimetres away from the edge of the dwelling, and they obviously were used to strengthen the clay wall around it.
Kostienki I is sometimes also called Polyakovo. P P Yefimenko did some research there during 1931 to 1936, and A N Rogatchev researched during 1938. Yefimenko uncovered an oval-shaped settlement measuring 14 to 15 metres by 36 metres, where numerous tools were found in the deposits inside the dwelling, although only a few implements occurred outside. It is possible that the living room was surrounded by some kind of walls. At the edge of this settlement Yefimenko found four large pits filled with deposits, and he called them the winter hut-pits. He also found twelve smaller ones which were used to keep bones in. If the building covered the whole area, as Yefimenko assumes, the pits at the edge could then be remains of the construction. It is more likely, however, that only part of the area was covered, a fact indicated by the finds. Semi-subterranean hut-pit 'A' could be described as one of the larger dwellings. It is about 2 metres by 3.5 metres and has a small terraced passage leading to the outside. A mammoth tusk and two shoulder-blades were found here with which the entrance could be covered up. Mammoth shoulder-blades were also used in the Upper Palaeolithic to cover graves, so that it is not surprising that they were also used to build huts. A similar entrance at the back of the hut was also found; it was shorter and steeper. But this could have been some kind of light shaft.
The floor of the hut-pit was more or less flat and showed outlines of two circles. One of them was larger and had a fireplace in the centre. The smaller circle had two layers of bones. The upper layer consisted mainly of shoulder-blades, hip-bones, and tusks of the mammoth. The lower layer, which was level with the floor of the hut, consisted mainly of tusks which were laid with the points turned inwards towards the centre of the room. They were fairly regularly spaced. This was presumably the supporting framework of the dome shaped roof which collapsed once the hut-pit was empty. The floor of the hut was approximately I metre below the ground and the top of the hut rose 0.8 to 1.0 metres.
These facts led Polykarpovitch to believe that these pit-huts must have been used for sleeping and somehow were kept warm: otherwise they would not have been sufficient protection against the cold. They showed no traces of typical fireplaces; one layer of coal and ash could be found and there was only a little space left around the remains of embers. It could be that the main fire was kept somewhere else and that the inhabitants collected the hot ash and bone 'coal' in rolled up animal skins and took them back to their huts and slept on them. This hypothesis is strengthened by the fact that no traces of stone nor large bones could be found inside the huts. Rogatchev also assumed that sick people could have been cured there. But an answer to this suggestion can only be given after further research has been carried out.
Along the middle of the large settlement eleven fireplaces were found. two of them a little further away, towards the edge of it. Several irregular, bowl-shaped depressions and small holes were found inside the dwelling which might have been used as storage places. Beside some of the depressions large mammoth bones had been stuck vertically into the ground. According to Yefimenko they were used as working tables or anvils, and the pits which contained numerous implements could be thought of as the working places. Rogatchev also discovered well-preserved remains of hut constructions in Kostienki-Anosovskaya with several deep store pits, where large bones were used in their construction.
Bone needles were found at Kostienki.
How to make a bone needle: A small bone splinter is removed by making two grooves (or sometimes three if a short one is made at the blunt end of the needle) using a flint burin. The splinter is then perforated, shaped and polished on a piece of sandstone.
It should be noted that the flint for the tools found at Kostienki came from at least 90 miles away. This would be a powerful incentive for getting the most blades possible from each nodule of flint.
Photo: B & G Delluc, 'Prehistoric Hunters'
Click on the image to see a close up
Drilled bead of fossilised sea-urchin spine, 36 000 years BP.
Photo: Time Magazine 13th Feb 1995
Tête zoomorphe sculptée de S(K?)ostienski 1 - Collection MAE - Photo L. Iakovleva.
Carved head from S(K?)ostienski 1 - Collection MAE - Photograph L Iakovleva.
Photo and French text: "les mammouths - Dossiers
Archéologie - n° 291 - Mars 2004"
Photograph L Iakovleva.
My thanks to Anya for access to this resource.
Kostenki Limestone Venus
Found at the Russian site of Kostenki in 1988, is by far the biggest such object known from the ice age. The height of the surviving fragment is 13.5 cm (5.5 inches) It is noteworthy not only for its massive size and the prominent navel, but also for the bracelets on the wrists, which appear to be joined together at the front like a pair of handcuffs.
Photo: P. Bahn, 'Prehistoric Art'
|

|

|
Another view of the Kostenki Limestone Venus
Photo: http://www.exn.ca/Stories/2000/02/03/53.asp
|
2 cm long stylised stone mammoth from Kostienki.
Photo: J. Jelinek, 'The Evolution of Man'
Pipes made from long, hollow bird bones from Kostienki 1. They may have been musical instruments or animal lures.
Photo: K. Sklenar, 'Hunters of the Stone Age'
Kostienki Venus front.
|
Kostienki Venus side.
|
Kostienki Venus back.
|
This Venus figure from Kostienki made of mammoth bone shows the characteristic pregnancy, well developed buttocks and pendulous breasts of many such statues. In the rear view she can be seen to be wearing a fringe or girdle.
Photo: G. Clark, 'The Stone Age Hunters'


Two figurines from Kostenki/Kostienki
Photo: J Jelinek, 'The Evolution of Man'
Two small carvings in ivory from Kostenki 1
Photo: N.D. Praslov

Another photo of the venus above.
A figure of a naked woman. Her head is covered with rows of shallow teeth cuts, depicting, according to Z.A.Abramova, hair or a closely fitting head-dress. Engraved and relief lines on the chest and on the back. Mammoth's tusk. Height 11,4 cm. Found in 1936, excavation made by P.P. Efimenko, who thought it to be "one of the best creations of that period, known to us".
From:
http://vm.kemsu.ru/en/palaeolith/plastic/costenki.html
The decorated head of a spade from Kostenki 1.
Photo: Archaeology of the USSR - The Palaeolithic of the USSR.
My thanks to Vladimir Gorodnjanski for access to this resource.
Fragment of a bracelet from Kostenki 1.
Photo: Archaeology of the USSR - The Palaeolithic of the USSR.
My thanks to Vladimir Gorodnjanski for access to this resource.
Venus figure.
Photo: Vladimir Gorodnjanski, 2006
Venus figure.
This has the classic and famous beaded decoration around the neck and above the breasts.
Photo: Vladimir Gorodnjanski, 2006
Venus figure.
This figure has lost both legs and head.
Photo: Vladimir Gorodnjanski, 2006
Venus figure.
This is a fascinating venus figure. It has what appears to be an item of clothing or decoration below the breasts, the functionality of which is unclear.
Photo: Vladimir Gorodnjanski, 2006

The Yeliseevichi venus figure.
From: www.folklore.ee/folklore/vol18/pa04.pdf
The Yeliseevichi site was discovered
in 1930 and it is located
on the river Sudost, the right
tributary of the Desna, in the
Briansk Province, Russia. The
majority of prehistoric artefacts
was found in a heap of mammoth
sculls piled next to a residential
house. The most remarkable
of these is a finely
modelled 15 cm tall figure depicting
a shapely woman with
no feet, head and hands, carved
of mammoth tusk. The figurine has prominent buttocks and legs.
(This venus figure, which may be a copy, appears never to have had a head, and the sculpture emphasises the thighs and buttocks rather than the breasts, although they are certainly indicated. This has the look of a younger figure which has not yet gone through childbirth. The waist is slim, the hips and thighs are well formed, as are the breasts, unchanged by child-rearing. It has quite a different emphasis and seems from a different tradition when compared with most other Kostenki venuses, nor for that matter with most of the other Gravettian venuses from France, for example. It has affinities with the unusual "venus impudique" from France. - Don)
Photo (left): Vladimir Gorodnjanski, 2006
Photo (right): www.folklore.ee/folklore/vol18/pa04.pdf
Statuette féminine de Kostienki 1, vue de face. Collection MAE. Photo
L. Iakovleva.
Venus from Kostienki 1, frontal view. Collection MAE. This seems to be the same as one of the venuses drawn above.
Photo and French text: "les mammouths - Dossiers
Archéologie - n° 291 - Mars 2004"
Photograph L Iakovleva.
My thanks to Anya for access to this resource.
Vulve sculptée de Kostienki 1. Collection MAE. Photo L. Iakovleva.
Vulva sculpture from Kostienki 1. Collection MAE.
Photo and French text: "les mammouths - Dossiers
Archéologie - n° 291 - Mars 2004"
Photograph L Iakovleva.
My thanks to Anya for access to this resource.
These photos appear to be of the same figurine from Kostenki/Kostenky/Kostienki, although the colour cast in the images are entirely different.
23 000 - 21 000 BC
Limestone
H 10.2 cm
This figurine represents the Palaeolithic 'Venus', with overlarge breasts and belly. The faceless head bends towards the chest while the arms are pressed to the body with hands on the belly. Covering the surface of the head are rows of incisions indicating a hair style or cap. Relief work in the form of a tight plait convey a breast ornament tied up at the back. There are bracelets on the arms.
Photo: (left) http://www.hermitagemuseum.org/html_En/03/hm3_2_1a.html. (this server has since disappeared)
(right images) http://exn.ca/stories/2000/02/03/53.asp
|
|
Head of a venus known popularly as the golf ball. From the Kostenki I site in Russia. The real basket headware was made of plaited starts and coiled basketry, copied here in stone.
Photo: http://www.unl.edu/rhames/212/venus/venus_string.html
|
Dr. Olga Soffer examining the "golf ball" head of the Venus of the Kostenki I site in Russia.
"Because they have emotionally charged thingies like breasts and buttocks, the Venus figurines have been the subject of more spilled ink than anything I know of," Dr. Soffer said.
"There are as many opinions on them as there are people in field."
Text and Photo: http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/history/lecture02/r_2-1.html
From:
http://carbon14.univ-lyon1.fr/synits.htm
Kostenki-Borshchevo area is the principal for the chronology of Upper Palaeolithic of the Eastern Europe. More than 25 sites are located on the territory of about 20 sq. km, along the right bank of the Don. Taking into account that more than 10 sites are multi-layer, remains of more than 50 settlements of palaeolithic times are represented here.
The stratigraphy of the second terrace above the floodplain of the Don and of the large ravines was the basis for relative chronology which was established by A.N.Rogachev in the middle sixties in cooperation with the geologists M.N. Grishchenko, G.I. Lazukov, A.A. Velichko. The sequence of deposits from the top up to bottom is represented by the following succession: chernozem, followed by loess-like loams, and two humic beds, separated by non-humic loams with lenses of volcanic ash.
At the first stage the chronological scheme consists of four, later - of three chronological groups. The first (ancient) group included sites with cultural layers in the lower humic bed; the second consisted of sites in the upper humic bed; and the third included sites in the overlaying loess loams which constitute a colluvial deposit on the first and second terraces above the floodplain.
The background for the division of lower and upper humic beds is the horizon of the sterile loam containing lenses of volcanic ash. According to analytical investigations, the age of the volcanic ash can be regarded as 35-32 kyr, (i.e. 35 000 to 32 000 years ago) and can be attributed to one of the eruptions of Campi Flegrei in Italy. These dates appear to be an upper limit of the first chronological group, which framework is define at 33-36 kyr with the very probable more ancient lower limit back to 40 kyr. Among the series of 17 14C dates for 6 site of this group the most important are dates of 34-37 kyr for Kostenki 1 (V), 36 kyr for Kostenki 12 (III) and Kostenki 17 (II), and 33 kyr for Kostenki 14 (IVa). Pollen records indicate an evolution of the vegetation from pine forest conditions to forest with the dominant of spruce (Picea) of tiaga type and to the meadow-steppe associations. The climate change from cold to temperate, relatively warm and humid correspond to the interglacial environment in the lower part and to the beginning of glaciation in the upper part of the deposits of the lower humic bed. Paleomagnetic digression correlated with Lashamp excursus (41-43 kyr) was identified inside this deposits. Times and conditions of the accumulation of lower humic bed are comparable with the Hengelo interglaciation of Western Europe.
Remains of 14 settlements, 10 of which have a radiocarbon dates, compose the second chronological group which cultural layers lie in the deposits of the upper humic bed above the horizon of volcanic ash. According to series of 14C dates for Kostenki 1 (III), Kostenki 12 (Ia), Kostenki 14 (II) the age of the sites and the times of the accumulation of upper humic bed are defined in the frameworks of 32-27 kyr. Pollen records are the evidence for the very complicated processes of climate fluctuation during this period. From 7 up to 4 vegetation cycles are identified on Kostenki 1, 14, 17. In general the climate and environment indicate the replacement of the warm humid interglacial conditions by cold and dry environment of the glaciation. The most probable equivalent seems to be Arcy-Denecamp - Kesselt period of Western scheme.

40.827 N, 14.139 E; summit elev. 458 m
The volcano of Campi Flegrei (Phlegrean Fields, Greek for "burning fields") lies immediately to the west of Napoli, and its deposits form much of the hills on which the higher areas of that city have been constructed. Less conspicuous as a volcano than neighboring Vesuvio, the Campi Flegrei must be considered one of the most dangerous volcanoes in Italy, mostly because of continuing unrest and dense population within the caldera and in its immediate vicinity.
Volcanism has occurred in the Campi Flegrei area during the past 50 thousand years, including two extremely violent explosive eruptions, the one that erupted the Campanian ignombrite (35 thousand years ago) and another one only 12 thousand years ago which produced the Neapolitan Yellow Tuff. The erupted volumes show a general decrease with time, and the most recent eruptions were characterized by moderate to small volumes.
Photo: http://www.geo.mtu.edu/~boris/CAMPIFLEGREI.html
From Wikipedia:
Campi Flegrei, also known as the Phlegrean Fields (Greek for "burning fields"), is a large Caldera area situated in the west area of Napoli, Italy. Today most of the crater lies underwater, but includes the town of Pozzuoli and the Solfatara crater, home of the Roman god of fire, Vulcan. It is thought that the caldera was created in 2 major events, the first (Campanian Ignimbrite) occurred in the area about 40,000 years ago. At approximately 12,000 years ago another major eruption occurred forming a smaller caldera inside the main one (centered on the town of Pozzuoli), this event is known as the Neopolitan Yellow Tuff (referring to the characteristic yellow rocks there).
In 1538, an 8-day eruption in the area deposited enough material to create a new hill, Monte Nuovo ("new mountain").